Your Ignorance IS The Problem

“What are Men? Not rational Beings, surely, as they pretend to be, they bawl about Liberty, & only want the Liberty to make themselves slaves.”
~Thomas Tudor Tucker~
(May 13, 1789)

When I was growing up the older generation used to call the television the boob tube or the idiot box. I used to find that somewhat insulting, because when I was a kid being called a boob didn’t mean you were a woman’s breast, it meant you were an extremely stupid individual. Ever hear the saying, “With age comes wisdom”? Well, with the passage of time age has once again shown me that the ‘older’ generation may have been on to something I couldn’t see as a kid.

Now I’m not saying that those who watch a lot of television ARE stupid; what I’m saying is that watching a lot of television, (particularly the news), makes people stupid. This is doubly so if you happen to watch a lot of cable news on channels like FOX, MSNBC or CNN. You may as well inject yourself with horse manure if you honestly think than any of the news you’re watching isn’t biased or manipulated.

If you watch the news, especially if you do so to find out about major breaking news stories, then you’re most likely being pumped full of CIA fabricated misinformation. I can almost hear your thoughts now, “Here he goes again with those damned conspiracy theories.” Well a conspiracy is merely a plan by two or more people to commit an illegal or subversive act, and a theory is only something that has yet to be proved. However, there is plenty of evidence which supports this ‘conspiracy theory’ if you’d just unplug your TV and read about it.

Ever hear of Oscar Calloway? Calloway was a U.S. Congressman back in the early 1900’s, and one day he stood up on the floor of the House of Representatives and said, “In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States, and a sufficient number of them, to control generally the policy of the daily press….They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers.

An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper, to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature, considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”

Now if you think that quote was fabricated by those who believe in these ‘conspiracy theories’, then I suggest you find a copy of the Congressional Record for the year 1917 and turn to page 2947. You’ll see it right there in black and white; part of the recorded history of Congress. So if the wealthiest of American businessmen can buy the newspapers, and decide what news they’ll print, what makes you think the CIA can’t do the same thing with television news?

Have you ever heard of Operation Mockingbird? Unless you’re a regular reader of my articles, you probably have not. Operation Mockingbird is a program by which the CIA, that began during the Cold War, (oh, I forgot, some of you kids were born after that ended), in which the CIA sought to utilize mass media to influence public opinion. Do you understand what that means; I mean DO YOU REALLY UNDERSTAND??? What that means is that if you get your news off the boob tube, then the information you are forming your opinions on is probably CIA disinformation – i.e. propaganda.

Operation Mockingbird did not limit its influence solely upon the television news; it also sought to exert its influence on newsprint as well. Both Time and Life Magazines were CIA run fronts, as was the New York Times, the Washington Post, and even the Christian Science Monitor.

The truth is that, if you want the truth you’re not going to get it from the boob tube or any of the major news papers; including USA Today, the New York and L.A. Times, the Chronicles, the Examiners, or any of the other fancy titles that imply they are filled with articles written by those possessing journalistic integrity.

These news stories you read and see on the news are designed to either shape your opinion for you or to limit what information you are being given on a story so that any opinions you form will be biased in a manner they control. I have to be so blunt, but if you watch the TV for your news, you’re a fucking dupe; someone whose thoughts and opinions are not their own; they are the fabrications of some twisted fuck who sits in a cubicle at the Central Intelligence Agency.

What you need to realize is, if there is a major story, with national implications, then there is a very real possibility that the coverage of that story you are watching is manufactured to shape your opinions; not provide you with the actual facts.

Just think about the stories that you see on the news; especially the ones that the news media latches onto like a dog with a bone; the mass shootings, terrorists attacks, or this Covid virus, they all are designed to get you to react a certain way in response to the information you are provided with; which 9 times out of 10 only contain a grain of truth to them.

They have gotten so good at this, aided a lot by the pathetic educations you have gotten at the hands of the public indoctrination centers; oops, I meant schools; which don’t teach you how to think critically; rather they teach you to think within the parameters of a box they create; imprisoning your mind. Anyone tries to reach you with truths that aren’t already inside that box, then you have been taught to reject them; to give them no consideration, and to label the person bearing those truths a nutcase, a cuckoo…a CONSPIRACY THEORIST.

Look at all this protesting and rioting over the alleged death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis Police Officer Derek Chauvin. As I’ve said in other recent posts, I’m not saying events didn’t unfold exactly as that video showed they did, but then again I’m not saying they did either. I’m only saying is that the response to that video was predictable; because people have been programmed to respond to certain stimuli in certain ways. All they had to do was put out a story saying a (white) cop killed a (black) man and they knew the conditioning would kick in and there would be moral outrage, speeches, protests, and possibly even riots.


The problem with all this is that once people take a side on issues like this, once they form and opinion, the doors of their mind slam shut and they refuse to accept any information which might cause them to admit that they were wrong; force them to revise their position. It is the rare individual indeed who can, in the midst of an emotionally based state of mind, examine facts which cause them to forego their emotions and change their opinions. It happens, but not very often.

All people have been taught, [conditioned] to do is analyze basic facts, sometimes visual stimulations, and come to a conclusion based upon them. The people saw a white cop assaulting a black man, and they were triggered. Rage ensued, the desire for vengeance ensued, and those passions were expressed in riots and protests; which always draws out opportunists who seek the hide among the legitimate protesters to mask their desire to wreck havoc; to watch the world burn as a result of their actions.

If someone were to take a video of me saying something like, “I hate when people use the word faggot” but then only broadcast the part where I actually say the word ‘faggot’ people will call me homophobic; because they did not see the entire comment; a portion of it was taken out of context to cause you to hate me for being homophobic.

And, by the way, I am not homophobic; I don’t care what you do being closed doors with anyone else, as long as both of you are consenting adults. What I do care about is when those who engage in that kind of behavior try to make me accept it as normal, or subsidize it out the taxes taken from my wages.

My belief is that it is abnormal behavior; they call them reproductive organs for a reason you know; and men having sex with other men, or women having sex with other women cannot produce a life. So to me, that’s abnormal behavior; it violates nature. But if you want to do that kind of stuff, go for it, just don’t demand I keep my mouth shut about my thoughts on it, or accept it as normal behavior.
Sorry, got kind of side tracked there for a moment.

Getting back to the George Floyd incident which has sparked all this protesting and rioting, I have noticed that Mr. Floyd has been elevated from the status of a criminal to a martyr for the cause of justice. Should he have been killed, [that’s assuming anyone in that video was anything other than a paid actor], no, he should not have been killed in the manner he was. But the news media, and members of the black community, have elevated Mr. Floyd to a pedestal which is only a few steps short of sainthood.

George Floyd, although he shouldn’t have died in the manner that video shows, was no saint. Mr. Floyd was what we call a repeat offender; a career criminal. For crying out loud, the toxicology reports done during his autopsy show that he was under the influence of Fentanyl and Methamphetamines at the time of his death; meaning he was stoned out of his gourd.

Does that matter? Nope, white cop + black victim = outrage and martyrdom.

What about his criminal record, does that matter in disproving his elevation to martyr? Hmm, I’ll let YOU be the judge of that. In 1998 Mr Floyd spent 10 months in prison for theft with a firearm; or armed robbery. In 2002 he spent 8 months in prison for a drug charge. In 2004 he spent another 10 months in prison for a cocaine offense. In 2005 he spent yet another 10 months in prison for possession of cocaine amounting to less than 1 gram. Then in 2005 Floyd participated in a home invasion robbery in which he pulled a gun and held it to a pregnant woman’s stomach while his thug friends searched the house for drugs and money. Floyd spent 5 years in prison for that one.

But does any of that matter? No, white cop + black victim = outrage and martyrdom.

The BLM (Black Lives Matter) movement has taken the death of George Floyd and turned it into a movement to divide people along racial lines. But do black lives matter to them; really matter?

What about David Dorn, age 77 who was gunned down by rioters while he was trying to prevent looters from robbing a pawn shop in St. Louis Missouri? David Dorn, who’s he? Well Mr. Dorn was a retired police officer with a spot free record who just tried to do what was right; and he was gunned down by rioters for it.

Oh, by the way, David Dorn was black!!!

Where the fuck was the BLM when that happened? Where the fuck is their outrage over an upstanding BLACK citizen was gunned down in cold blood by rioters they supported? Black Lives Matter alright, but only when those lives are taken by cops or white men.

I remember when the Black Lives Matter movement became a thing, someone said All Lives Matter – and they were called racist for saying that. This is part of the programming people have undergone, one which keeps us divided along many lines; rich versus poor, black versus white, and anything else that can used as a wedge to keep people from uniting for one common thing; liberty and justice for all.

George Floyd has become the latest in a long line of poster boys for those in the black community who do not want to accept responsibility for the poverty and crime in their communities; who want to point their fingers at the big bad white man and his corrupt system that keeps them poor and oppressed.

Just look at what is happening to anything that represents the Confederate States of America and you’ll see that the racial divide that existed when slavery was still practiced is still there; and the fissure is widening constantly because schools do not teach the truth regarding that period of American history, and the news media keeps the fires of racial tension burning by pouring gasoline onto them with stories about injustice against blacks.

Yet if we were to look at the history of the Civil War we would see that going back to the beginning of America, a southerner named Thomas Jefferson, (and yes he owned slaves), sought to free them; to educate them, and then to relocate them outside the United States.

In his Notes on the State of Virginia Jefferson answers the question of why not free the blacks and let them live among the whites, “It will probably be asked, Why not retain and incorporate the blacks into the state, and thus save the expense of supplying, by importation of white settlers, the vacancies they will leave? Deep rooted prejudices entertained by the whites; ten thousand recollections, by the blacks, of the injuries they have sustained; new provocations; the real distinctions which nature has made; and many other circumstances, will divide us into parties, and produce convulsions, which will probably never end but in the extermination of the one or the other race.” (Notes on State of Virginia, Query XIV)

Yeah I know, Oh My God, Jefferson thought blacks should be sent out of the country. So did someone else; someone who has been elevated to the status of one of our greatest presidents because he freed the slaves; none other than Abraham Lincoln.

In a publicized rebuttal of the Dred Scott decision Lincoln stated, “The enterprise is a difficult one; but “when there is a will there is a way;” and what colonization needs most is a hearty will. Will springs from the two elements of moral sense and self-interest. Let us be brought to believe it is morally right, and, at the same time, favorable to, or, at least, not against, our interest, to transfer the African to his native clime, and we shall find a way to do it, however great the task may be.”

You see, Lincoln was an abolitionist; he thought slavery was evil; but so did George Mason, who in 1773 wrote, “That slow poison…is daily contaminating the minds and morals or our people. Every gentleman here is born a petty tyrant. Practiced in acts of despotism and cruelty, we become callous to the dictates of humanity, and all the finer feelings of the soul. Taught to regard a part of our own species in the most abject and contemptible degree below us, we lose that idea of dignity of man which the hand of nature has implanted in us for great and useful purposes.” Oh, Mason was also a southerner and a slaveholder.

But you see, what you aren’t taught in school is that not only was Lincoln an abolitionist, he was an EXLUSIONIST. Exclusionists, among which many of the northern Republicans were, are those who believe that the land of the United States was for whites only. They were what YOU might call today, the first White Supremacists.

Hell, in a debate for the presidency against Stephen Douglas, Lincoln stated, “While I was at the hotel to-day, an elderly gentleman called upon me to know whether I was really in favor of producing a perfect equality between the negroes and white people. [Great Laughter.] While I had not proposed to myself on this occasion to say much on that subject, yet as the question was asked me I thought I would occupy perhaps five minutes in saying something in regard to it. I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, [applause]-that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

In fact, up until the years immediately preceding the nomination and election of Abraham Lincoln the Northern States had been divided into factions; with the Whigs, and the Free Soil factions dividing them and depriving them of political power. It was not until they united together into the Republican Party; whose platform was based upon Abolitionism and Exclusionism, that the Republicans were able to gain control of the White House after years of Democratic control.

Yet do any of these facts matter? No, Confederate Flag, Robert E. Lee, Southerners in general = Slavery = Evil = reason to hate them and deny their history and the truth. Forget about the beliefs of the North, forget about how the Northern States passed laws which would not allow freed slaves to move into their State, or how during the Civil War freed slaves were herded up by Union Forces and put into a concentration camp near Natchez, Mississippi, and left to die.

None of that matters, the South was evil because they OWNED slaves. Forget about the fact that Northern States, Northern ship owners profited mightily from slavery; that Brown University, a bastion of Ivy League learning, was built primarily off the profits made from the slave trade.

Lincoln, the Great Emancipator, throughout his political career, just wanted the slaves out of America so that America could be a land of WHITE Americans. History proves that to be true. Yet Jefferson, a southern slave owner, proposed a plan for educating them; providing them with the knowledge, the skills, and the tools required to become a self sufficient people. Then, and only then did he recommend that they be colonized outside the U.S.

But Jefferson was evil because he owned slaves, while Lincoln didn’t. Yet which of the two former Presidents had the best interests of the blacks in mind; Lincoln or Jefferson?

I know I’ll probably catch a lot of flack over this; but you know what, I don’t care. I stand for the truth in all things, and if the truth offends you, then too damned bad!!!

I stand for liberty and justice for all; not just for whites, and not just for blacks…FOR ALL MEN/WOMEN! If George Floyd actually did die in the manner shown in that video, then even though he was a career criminal he deserves justice. Yet at the same time, those who claim to be supporters of black lives, need to show equal outrage over the senseless death of David Dorn; but I’m betting you won’t hear a peep from them about it because it does not support their agenda.

Oh, and since we’re on the topic of justice for all, what about justice for Tony Timpa? Never heard of him? Why doesn’t that surprise me? Tony Timpa was a mental patient suffering from schizophrenia and depression. In 2016 Timpa dialed 911 and told the operator he had come off his medication and needed help.

The police arrived and pinned him to the ground, in a manner similar to that which supposedly caused the death of George Floyd. On a bodycam video taken from one of the officers you can see Timpa screaming, “You’re going to kill me” all while the officers laughed, told jokes, and kept Timpa’s face buried in the ground for 14 minutes.

Where were the riots and protests for Tony Timpa; or are blacks the only ones deserving of such things?

Like I said, I am for liberty and justice for all; but the sad thing is people don’t know what either are, and most don’t want them either. If you try to use facts, or common sense with people these days you find yourself targeted for insult by those who are incapable of critical thought, and are sorely lacking in common sense. To them it is their way or the highway.

Take the Pro Choice movement. They are all for a woman’s right to choose in deciding to terminate the life growing in her womb, but a woman’s right to rent out her body to men who are willing to pay for her time is wrong and should be criminalized. Yet the former is murder; no matter how you look at it, and the other is simply a business transaction between a person who has a commodity that she wishes to sell, or rent, for a mutually agreed upon price.

And not to leave out those on the conservative side of the coin, I hear all these pro 2nd Amendment groups whining about all the laws that have been enacted which violate, or infringe upon, their right to keep and bear arms. Yet not a one of them will go on record proclaiming their support for the purpose for which that right exists; to rise up and shake off a tyrannical government. What good is having a right if you don’t use it for the purpose it was intended for?

I’m woefully tired of people and their arguments in support of their positions on issues; positions that are founded upon the indoctrination they underwent in school, and which are reinforced by the media. I don’t look at things from the same perspective as most, I guess. I don’t see rich/poor; gay/straight; black/white, I only see people – individuals; each of whom has certain rights and liberty our system was supposedly designed to secure and defend.

Those who proclaim themselves to be supporters of minorities; be those minorities gay, poor, or black, should take to mind something Ayn Rand once said, “The smallest minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities.”

I am a defender of the truth, and of the rights and liberty of the individual. It matters not to me whether those who seek to violate the rights, or deny the liberty of an individual are black or white; they are enemies to all that I stand for. And it does not matter to me who the victim of such oppression is; be they black, gay, or poor, I will defend them and their rights to my last dying breath.

It’s not about right versus left; rich versus poor; black versus white, it’s about liberty versus tyranny. So choose your side, but choose well; for if you align yourself behind a cause, an agenda, that seeks to impose tyranny upon those you disagree with, then you do not stand for what America once believed in, and you are my enemy.

It’s pretty simple actually, it just means following the Golden Rule; do unto others as you would have others do unto you. If you want me to defend and respect your rights, then you better make sure you defend and respect mine. You do that, we’ll get along just fine regardless of who you are, your social status, or your skin color. But if you don’t, then I don’t really care who you are, you are my enemy and I will defend my rights and liberty against you with whatever force I deem the situation warrants.

So tread lightly, you, your causes, and your agendas have pushed a large segment of this country into a corner; and if you have studied nature at all you will understand that the most dangerous animal on the planet is the one that is cornered and has to fight for its freedom.

So I would suggest to you that you unplug your TV’s, delete your Twitter accounts, and pick up a few history books and begin learning the truth; for what you’re saying now is just a repetition of the thoughts that have been planted into your minds by those who have controlled your indoctrination since the day you were born.

About Br'er Rabbit

I'm just one person out of millions of others. The only thing different about me is that I don't walk around with my head up my ass.
This entry was posted in General. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.